April 30, 2026
For the Theory of Evolution to even be plausible, it must demonstrate certain beneficial germline mutations that confer fitness gains to offspring which ultimately result in physiological change (morphology). Genetics have demonstrated that only certain mutations fit this criteria. Mutations that modify the folded protein and confer physiological changes to offspring are a subset of nonsynonymous germline mutations. These are germline mutations which means they happen at conception as passed from the parents to the offspring. These mutations must result in nonsynonymous protein folds. This means that the folded protein is modified. An example is Sickle Cell— the round blood cell emerges as a sickle shape. Which is a genetic disease.
Finally, because biology works in a three dimensional mode, that is by physical shape of proteins and enzymes, the novel (all new) folded protein provides altered shape and therefore also different function, sometimes subtle, other times detrimental.
Unfortunately, through many hundreds of billions of dollars of genetic research on these same type of rare mutations, researchers have found that whenever such a novel folded protein emerges, while it is usually destroyed by the cell— those that pass cellular scrutiny are empirically harmful. These are the mutations that cause congenital (genetic) disease.
Why? Because our cells work as a team with many nano-tools and “workers” (enzymes) running the factory of the cell. When the factory tooling and workers do not recognize the folded protein, it gets marked for destruction. However, for those few that get past, these are known empirically to directly fill the catalogs of the tens of thousands of known genetic diseases, cancers, tumors, deformities, disabilities, infertility, and even premature death. -1
This empirical genetic evidence is the Theory of Evolution’s greatest problem. The very idea that somehow these rare nonsynonymous germline mutations might derive fitness benefit toward physiological morphology is purely a conjecture (a deduction based on no direct physical evidence). This is because it has never been observed to happen as a benefit. Not once.
The answer we are given is that it must be happening too slow to observe. Does that answer satisfy you? Why is it that we observe harm from these mutations every day in hospitals and laboratories around the world, but not one beneficial mutation?
It is because the Theory of Evolution is a mythology?
