April 30, 2026
Mutations to the germline are essential for the theory of evolution to be plausible. It must render novel protein folds that lead to physiological morphology as a fitness gain to offspring. Unfortunately, such mutations are vastly harmful and outside a handful off highly dubious examples there are none to speak of. Turns out that at least 95% of all cancers come from mutations (both somatic and germline).
We have studied and analyzed the whole genome, and our analyses of mutations that are affecting cancer genes have enabled us to genetically explain 95 percent of the cancer occurrences we have studied by means of mutations.” — Joachim Weischenfeldt https://scitechdaily.com/massive-genetic-map-of-cancer-mutations-cataloged-available-to-doctors-and-researchers-worldwide
It would seem that if the Theory of Evolution were indeed correct, we would have at least as many examples of beneficial mutations to the germline as we find detrimental to it. We just don’t find any. What does that tell you?
“Would any computer programmer expect to discover that a series of random coding errors (such as letters deleted, transposed, duplicated, or added) within coding might somehow cause progressive improvements to the function of the software? The answer is no way. At best, a few errors might remain “silent” (sound familiar in genetics too?), as neither helping nor damaging the program due to the coding error. Any continued accumulation of such coding errors will prove catastrophic to function (also matching the data behind genetics).” -1
1-MUTATIONS ARE GENETIC ERRORS; ERRORS ARE DEGRADATIVE (BAD).
